the argument that starts in the in-decision about the right thing to be said
and the right ways to say it
so long on the tracks of generational station-calling
derails
turns into arguments about what has already been said about that
what those sayings mean, stations been
whether they themselves had any answers
and what they might be…
and yet, further to this
calling-station of station-calling
and de-railing altogether
asking questions of the being able to say
and of the how to say
insofar as these two episodes are concerned
railed and derailed
both of them are inasmuch indistinguishable
as still issuing-from as making-issue-of one and the same issue
the actually sayable
a mere change to the pattern of the action from which it is repeated
from talking about talking
tracking the attacks
to talking about text
attacking the tracks
and that is all
One thought on “The fundamental shift of fundamentality”